"Father's Day 2021 Page!"

 

"Dad is forced to risk going to Prison in order to expose the truth of why he hasn't seen his only two son's, since May 2017...!"

"I realise although I'm telling you here of my own personal experience, I recognise that this experience is not limited just to myself, and is far to common amongst many men in modern day Britain today. And although society isn't interested in addressing these issues, whether that be via the media, or our schools and colleges, including our church's and mosques. We as a collective society continue to suffer and complain about the consequences of the repercussions, including the continued escalation of the youth on youth violence, violence against women, and calling out men for having misogynistic attitudes, but never ever addressing the reasons why, and where these attitudes are actually coming from, all while labelling any man whom demonstrates any signs of masculinity as toxic masculinity, whilst rarely if ever, addressing men's homelessness and suicide rates, along with the reasons why they are so high!  Both of which on reflection, I now recognise the close proximity" ~ #FatherlessBritain 

"Your words of encouragement serve as a beacon of light for fathers who may be facing difficult circumstances, reminding them to stay strong and keep moving forward. Thank you for spreading positivity and empathy during these times!" 

"Please share this Page and post your comments with your thoughts and, or your experiences in the (comments box) at the bottom of this page..."

"Insightful article piece. Thank you for the awareness of the issue's father's face today. Good luck with the fight, the impact will be beneficial to many." 

"Your message of encouragement and support, offers hope to many loving father's who may be struggling. It's a reminder that they are not alone in their experiences and that there are brighter days ahead. Holding onto hope and staying resilient in the face of adversity, can make a significant difference in navigating challenging situations, especially within the family division of the judiciary system, without having or possessing the professional knowledge, or resources of tangible advice!"

It's heart-breaking to hear about situations where a parent feels forced to take extreme measures, such as risking imprisonment, in order to have a relationship with their children. Parental alienation and custody battles can be emotionally and psychologically draining for all involved, especially the children caught in the middle.

It's crucial for parents to prioritize the well-being of their children and seek constructive ways to resolve conflicts and establish healthy co-parenting relationships. This may involve seeking mediation, counselling, or legal assistance to navigate complex family dynamics and ensure that the best interests of the children are always paramount.

Every family's situation is unique, and there are often no easy solutions. However, it's essential for parents to advocate for their rights and the rights of their children while also fostering open communication and cooperation with the other parent whenever possible.

If you or someone you know is experiencing difficulties in co-parenting or facing challenges in maintaining a relationship with their children, seeking support from professionals, support groups, or trusted individuals can provide valuable guidance and assistance during difficult times.

Remember, the well-being and happiness of the children should always be the primary focus, and parents should strive to create a nurturing and supportive environment for them to thrive, even in the face of adversity. 

His Royal Highness Speaking up for Mental Health

You'll remember, during that crazy time in the history of mankind, that being Covid-19, one of the main side effects that people were talking about was mental health. Even the Duke of Cambridge along with his brother Prince Harry, have been advocating for men’s’ mental health for several years now, and then there’s men just like us, me and you…!

Well, I was told by the family court judge in my case, that if I did this and tell you the world my story, of what has happened to me, and why I’ve not seen my son's now since May 2017, that she would lock me up. 

She told me this after being told that I'd built this website, "Fatherless Britain," straight after "committing a major denial fraud" right at the beginning of the hearing which allowed for this injustice to happen!!!

Public request for the Protection Of the Crown

Fixing Fatherless Britain

In an episode of dispatches aired on Tueday 20th of July 2021 reporter Louise Tickle highlighted the fact that it is actually a criminal offence to report on anything goes on within the Family Court due to a law that was written back in 1960, so an individual will be charged with contempt of court.

This is how they set me up to fail from the very beginning…

The last time I saw my sons, was when I took them to school back in May 2017 as usual. They were 9 and 11 at the time. Someone close to me saw one of them a couple of years ago and they were told, that mum and the social worker had told them both that they’re not allowed to see me, their Dad.

On that day when I went to pick my sons up from school later that afternoon. I'd made them one of Daddy’s home seasoned chicken, with Mac and cheese. One of their favourites at the time.

As I approached the school, I saw a friend, another father from the school when I received a text message from my ex-wife.

The text read as, “I’ve picked the boys up from school, they’re with me and they’re fine” and that was it. I’ve not seen them since. So in affect she kidnapped them as she wasn’t due to pick them up until the Thursday of that week, along with the fact that it had been confirmed of shared parenting that same day at the last of three Child Protection Meetings.

So, in that one swift afternoon, I went from being a full time Dad, to nobody. Just a man pining for his kids and I’m just supposed to just get over it…! Man up as they say! Mmmm...  

Earlier that day I’d attended the third and last child protection meeting.

So here it is

From the very beginning I was set up to fail starting with Waltham Forest Children’s Social Services.

The standard procedure when the police are called to a domestic incident and young children are present, is on the second occasion they will inform the children’s social services.

There were three arguments in total between myself and my ex-wife over a period of twelve years. On two of these occasions the police were called, this is when my what was already a nightmare, escalated. The first time she called the police and on the second occasion I called the police.

After the first two arguments when the police were called, she created a third argument out of nothing, then went to the social services saying that she was frightened of me. It wasn’t long after this that I discovered our children now had a social worker, but no one had told me or given me any details. All appointments had been arranged via my ex-wife. The Social Worker never once got in touch with me to get my version of events. I had to chase them to find out who their social worker was, and once I had the details, I arranged a meeting with her. She then went on holiday a day or so later after our meeting.

The first child protection meeting

In the first child protection meeting, the Chairwoman who would be chairing the meeting known to me as Rose, took me into a side interview room before the meeting began. She said that she’d heard about my father's recent passing. Then she asked me if I was ok to continue. She then continued telling me what the meeting was about, expressing that if I needed a break, to feel free to get up and leave the room at any time. It was at this point, it was made clear to me that I was in a Child Protection Meeting, which unbeknown to me. There were three Child Protection Meetings, all off which I attended.

The Chairwoman then took me into the meeting room and opened the meeting by introducing herself, then all who were in attendance introduced themselves starting with my ex-wife going round the table, to the accessing Social Worker, the assigned Social Worker who was taking the case, the former Primary School Headmistress, a female Police Officer, the Minute Taker, and myself the Father. To conclude, there were seven women along with myself, Dad. 

The Chairwoman opened the meeting by stating that the purpose of this meeting was due to domestic abuse/violence committed by myself towards my ex-wife, of which I knew wasn't a true representation of what had happened. So a serious allegation had been made against me, but prior to this meeting neither before or since have I ever been arrested, cautioned or legally chastised convicted, for domestic abuse or violence, or any other allegation of violence, what so ever.

Although there was a situation that occurred at home between myself and my ex-wife where by my children told me afterwards, that my ex-wife picked a knife behind my back. This forced me to call the Police. My children also confirmed this to the police officers themselves. I also informed the Police officers about the verbal, physical and mental abuse I endured. with some of the abuse factors that I’d endured.

However when the Police Officer spoke in that Child Protection meeting, there was no mention of the abuse that I had told them about. Instead they chose to focus on two previous occasions of when I had to defend myself, choosing describe these occasions as saying that I'd been 'known to the Police for violence.' Again, this wasn’t true. She went onto quote a date in 2012, of which after putting my hand up, I was allowed to rebut.

In order to be transparent for those of you taking the time to read this, let me explain.

In 2012, I returned a car that I'd purchased that wasn't as described. The two guys who were brothers who had sold me the car, tried to steal £1200 from me. Although initially I'd been found guilty of ABH at a Magistrates Court. this decision was overturned on appeal at the Crown Court. It was proved that I was defending myself against the two brothers who were in fact rogue car dealers and had pretended that they were selling me their mother's disabled car. But the Police Officer failed to out line of the facts relating to my case, as the fact is, I was proven innocent so there for it's not even supposed to come up for a fact.

As I was found innocent I failed to understand why this Police Officer wanted to paint me as a violent man, as I was found innocent in a court of law. Her intention was to create an element of doubt over an individual’s character, which was obviously the idea. In short, this is character assassination.

I now understand that what the Police Officer did, is known as the Propagation of Misinformation. The fancy buzz words used today to describe professionals when they’re found to be lying. They use this sophisticated technique to conceal the truth. 

The Police Officer then continued to state that I was involved in another violent situation back in 2008. However, this also was not factual. This led me to put my hand up again in order to verbalise my response to this allegation. But once again, I was quickly shouted down as I being told to be quite. I was unable to talk in order to defend myself. To be clear, the Chairwoman is the very same woman who initially appeared to show a level compassion and empathy, regarding the recent loss of my Father. She was now being the very opposite, as she was being extremely stern by telling me to be quite and put my hands down. This is actually in legal terms known as a Denial Fraud although I’d actually stated the fact that it wasn’t true. In doing this and committing this Denial Fraud, she is denying me my right to rebut this incorrect information that had been stated as a fact, and not allowing me represent myself appropriately and fairly. I was forced into silence and feeling oppressed, and powerless to defend myself. I was fully aware that if I attempted to defend myself, I would be stereotyped as being an aggressive, argumentative, uncooperative individual. These are the types of words that are used to discredit an individual, who is attempting to defend themselves with the truth, especially if the individual is showing any form of emotional stress due the situation of this environment. 

So, the Police Officer Propagated Misinformation’s twice, once behind the other, and the Chairwoman who shouted me down by telling me to put my hands down has committed a denial fraud. The fact of their status and whom they represent, as in the Local Authorities and the Metropolitan Police making them civil servants, they are representing the State. So now their actions become State Frauds upon a Citizen. 

So now I'm literally being oppressed, having nowhere to go metaphorically speaking.

Although I’d stated that wasn’t true, this gave them the room and the opportunity to write down, that I'd been known for violence for purposes should the case go to Court, as it did in my case.

Ms Lyndsey Lampard Children’s former Primary School Head Teacher

All of what your about to read involving Ms Lyndsey Lampard and other individuals is detailed and extremely important, as it shows the head teachers influence in the outcome in the Court.

Around the same time as this first Child Protection Meeting, Ms Lyndsey Lampard wrote a report for the Children’s Social Services. This was around December 2016.

There is one paragraph in particular which takes up the whole box in a section of this form. Ms Lyndsey Lampard wrote in her this statement, “There have been a number of parents who have complained of feeling intimidated by Mr Clark, however neither myself or any of my staff have ever felt this way about Mr Clark,” end of sentence.

Son building a lighthouse at school with his Daddy, Fatherless Britain

Same paragraph next sentence Ms Lyndsey Lampard states, “All of the parents that have described Mr Clark in this way, could all be described in the same manner themselves,” end of sentence end of paragraph that box completed.

Around March 2017, Ms Lyndsey Lampard started saying things in what is known as a 'Core meeting' at the school with Social Workers present, which was such a turnaround it’s disgusting. Her initial sentiment regarding me drastically changed. Obviously the Social Work's attending would record all comments made by writing these things down.

One of the things that Ms Lyndsey Lampard stated in one of these Core Meetings was that in February 2017, a ten year old boy was so frightened of Mr Clark that he brought a knife into the school.

What Ms Lyndsey Lampard failed to highlight in the meeting was that, the same ten year old boy had recently joined the school after having issues at his former school, and that the boy was also known to the social services.

Ms Lyndsey Lampard also failed to outline the fact that my eldest child had been experiencing very serious issues regarding being bullied. A particular incident of bullying took place in February 2017 involving the same ten year old boy who had brought the knife into the school, along with a group of other boys.

Now the mother of this ten year old boy was talking to my ex-wife a few days after this incident of bulling on the phone, and I was asked if I would talk to her son on her behalf. She was having issues with him at home and he wasn’t seeing his own father at that time. I agreed and between the two of them they arranged for us all to meet up at a local café, which took place about ten to fifteen minutes later that day being Friday after school had finished.

As agreed I spoke to him regarding the bulling of my son, he said he understood but didn’t agree with what I was saying. The fact that he was there with the other boys and he knew what he was witnessing was wrong, and he didn’t go and call a teacher for help makes guilty by association. As he started to get upset, I opened my arms and he literally jumped into my arms giving me a massive daddy type hug. So therefore I knew that I had done my job and had given him food for thought  in relation to his behaviour. 

The following day, that being Saturday, his mother was talking to me on the phone. She was at Tesco’s and was asking me for some advice about what type of vacuum cleaner to buy for her eldest son who was living in a care home, as he had learning disabilities. I mentioned that I was in the park with my two son's playing football. She then asked her son if he wanted to play football with us and before I knew it, she’d left Tesco’s and dropped her son off to me at the park and said when we’ve finished playing football, we could just leave him at the top of the road and he’d make his own way home. With him being just ten years old, we decided to walk him to his door and said good bye as he went indoors.

Now bearing all of this in mind, does it sound like this ten year old boy was really so scared of me? Also bearing in mind that he was involved in a serious incident of bullying the week before, along with some other boys who ganged up on my son, I have to ask the question, who was the knife really meant for!

But like I said, Ms Lyndsey Lampard isn’t writing or telling the whole story.

Prior to my relationship troubles and breaking up with my ex-wife, I had a very healthy relationship with Ms Lyndsey Lampard. It was such that with her permission, members of her staff would often print things off for me at the school when my printer wasn’t working or had ran out of ink. Ms Lyndsey Lampard also joined me with my neighbour Ann Korner, her former colleague and her good friend in attending Question time hosted by David Dimbleby, arranged by myself. Ms Lyndsey Lampard and Anne Korner also attended my wedding on my invitation. Ann Korners other daughter Esme Maddison also attended the wedding along with her husband Dean, and even helped in serving the food.

David Dimbleby, Nicholas Clark, Fatherless Britain

Before the third child protection meeting I wrote a letter of complaint to Ms Lyndsey Lampard, highlighting all of this and a lot more.

The second child protection meeting

The second child protection meeting was chaired by a man named Andrew Calderwood. He took me into the same interview room as Rose had done before. Prior to going into the meeting, he asked a series of questions and although I answered truthfully, he was totally dismissive of all my answers. So I knew at that point things were heading in the wrong direction for me.

The meeting started and he the new Chair, Andrew Calderwood, spent the best part of around twenty minutes plus going through the case papers.

When the meeting got started, he the new Chair attempted to propagate more misinformation and then committed another denial fraud. He stated that I had been known for violence in recent years on three occasions, again, not allowing me to rebut this. He was literally shouting at me, “Well that’s what it says here!” he said. So as the Chair person  proceeded to assassinate my character, my ex-wife then decided to join and started shouting me at me, and I was forced to sit there and shut up, and put up with all this abuse coming at me from all directions, bearing in mind I had been told I was unable to talk or defend myself.

 

Letter of Complaint to Ms Lyndsey Lampard

I wrote a letter of complaint to Ms Lyndsey Lampard prior to the third Child Protection Meeting in May of 2017, to which I understand she was legally obliged to respond to all points of my complaint, to which she did not.

Stage - two Complaint to the School Governing Board

I made a stage - 2 complaint about Ms Lyndsey Lampard to the school governing board, to no avail. My neighbour Ann Korner is Ms Lyndsey Lampard’s former colleague and they are good friends. Ann Korners other daughter Saffron Hillier, is also a good friend to Ms Lyndsey Lampard and she sits on this board of school governors. 

Complaint to all the heads of Waltham Forest Council

I contacted Ofsted to complain about Ms Lyndsey Lampard and they told me to contact to the local authority.

I sent an email to all the heads at Waltham Forest; 

corporate.complaints @walthamforest.gov.uk, complaints.officer @walthamforest.gov.uk, admissions @walthamforest.gov.uk, Angela Clarke, Rosalind Turner, Linzi Roberts-egan, Marion.fitzgerald, Martin Esom.

I received a reply from Reginald Coley.

He starts of his reply in his email to me by saying and he’s responding on behalf of all recipients.

This is the last paragraph which reads as;

I can only re-iterate their advice, as both of you have parental responsibility for your children; therefore, either of you can make individual decisions in relation to them. If you unable to find common ground suitable to you, your wife and your children; then ultimately, it would be something for the Courts to decide upon. The Council cannot assist you in this matter. 

Son taking selfie with Dad in Tree Den, Fatherless Britain

The third child protection meeting

The third Child Protection Meeting was extremely formal compared to the previous meetings, because not only had I brought a male Advocate along with me, but the fact that I had written a letter of complaint about Andrew Calderwood in relation to his dismissive /  passive / aggressive attitude towards me seeded to bring a different tone to this particular meeting. He sweepingly mentioned that he'd received my letter of complaint, however throughout the entire meeting my letter was never discussed or mentioned again. 

During this meeting, I was informed that my children's status had been reduced from 'Child Protection', to 'Children In Need,' of which I was happy about. I'd been speaking unofficially to a Fathers Social Worker and they informed me that they were unable to offer me support until my children's status was downgraded from Child Protection, to Children In Need.

My email to Andrew Calderwood;

Dear Andrew Calderwood;

Please find attached my personal statement regarding the way in which I felt I was treated in the last child protection meeting  from yourself, as I personally felt that your manner towards me was pre-judged, bias focused and passive aggressive.

I look forward to your open response in regards to the content of the attachment, as I would like to know your thoughts on the matter. I don't feel that I was given the proper or fare grounds to justify the facts addressed at me. 

Yours sincerely

Nicholas Clark

My Application to the court

Prior to May 2017, myself and my ex-wife were co-parenting our children, but living at different addresses. 

Around May 2017 I made an application while I was at the Family Court High Holborn, to have my children returned home, after my ex-wife decided to take the children out of school without informing me, and I've not seen them since. 

On that day when I went to pick my sons up from school, as I approached the school I received a text message from my ex-wife which basically outlined that she'd taken the boys. My heart sank, the rollercoaster ride of emotions were indescribable. I'd made them one of Daddy’s home made seasoned chicken, with Mac and cheese, one of their favourites at the time.

While at the Court I also applied for a Non-Molestation Order at the same time. As the Court was very close to closing time, I was rushing to complete my application. Unfortunately I didn’t get all of the information written down that I wanted to inform the Court about.

In this application hearing the Judge, paused the hearing while he left the Court and contacted Waltham Forest Social Services. When he came back, I was given the opportunity to address the Court. In doing so I stated the problems that I was having with my ex-wife regarding our children, as I believe her actions was primarily to get at me, when the Judge interrupted me raising his voice such that, it would be conceived as aggressive if I had addressed the Court in the same manner saying. “I’ve heard enough.” And with that, he ended the hearing instructing the beginning of the Court Custody Hearing Case.

What I found alarming was in two previous Child Protection Meetings, along with this Court hearing I was never given the opportunity to speak as I was abruptly silenced. So the Judge also committed a denial fraud by not allowing me to verbally state my case.

Ex-wife granted a non-molestation order

In another hearing that I wasn’t privy to, from my understanding the same Judge who had denied me a Non-Molestation Order, granted a Non-Molestation Order to my ex-wife. 

A Non-Molestation Order is a legal document where the plaintiff states all the facts of why they need this imposed to protect them, highlighting all abuses if any, and reasons for fear of the other party.

An example of one of my ex-wife's complaints in this Non-Molestation Order, was that she said an incident took place on a particular date. She doesn't remember what happened or what was said, but she stated that I was mentally abusing her.  Again in this Non-Molestation Order my ex-wife described a home with a husband being abusive and extremely argumentative. 

Fatherless Britain's former wife wanted to Reconciliation with Husband

When Laura Dean the Cafcass Officer visited my home, as part of a section 7 form needed to be completed, I then knocked on the door of my next door neighbour who are an elderly couple, and the husband clearly asked me in front of Laura Dean, "Nick, you know you said your Mrs is saying that you are argumentative and constantly arguing?" I replied "Yeah." He then said, "Well you must have been whispering mate because I'm right next door and I don't hear a peep out of ya." I smiled at him and looked at Laura Dean and she looked at me and smiled. When we entered my home, I confirmed what my neighbour had just said by asking her what she heard.

Another complaint from my ex-wife, is she doesn't want me to have anything to do with our children until I learn to control my apparent 'unpredictable' behaviour, without giving one example what so ever of what my unpredictable behaviour looks like. 

At a Court hearing in September 2017, I attempted to challenge the Non-Molestation Order that had been granted to my ex-wife but denied to me by the same Judge, and was advised that in his opinion, that the Non-Molestation Order should be heard within the custody hearing as he felt that they go hand in hand. 

In a number of hearings before the actual custody hearing that was heard in May 2018, from memory, having spoken to two different Judges, I asked them why I still wasn't allowed to see my children, and every time I was told the same thing as it was due to the statements made by my ex-wife.

Cafcass officer Laura Dean

It was at the Court hearing which took place in September 2017 that I first met Laura Dean, Cafcass Officer of the Family Court High Holborn, and Social Worker at Barking and Dagenham Social Services. At this hearing the Judge ordered a section 7 report to be completed of which Laura Dean was in instructed to undertake. The next hearing was due to take place in January 2018 of which this section 7 was due to be completed (as previously mentioned above).

I received an anonymous phone call around October 2017, from a woman who refused to identify herself.

December 2017 I became concerned as I hadn’t heard from Laura Dean in regards to the section 7 report, so I began calling her in a careful systemised manner. I initially didn’t have any contact details for Laura Dean although she’d taken my mobile number at the Court hearing in September 2017 when I first met her. I was able to get her office number along with her managers’ office number and the department floor number by phoning the main reception number at Barking and Dagenham Social Services. 

I would typically call Laura Dean in the morning, and because I couldn't get through to her, I would then call her manager's number and then the department's number. On each occasion I would leave a message and I would then leave it a day or so and would repeat this process. I was made to understand that if I called a Social Worker too often, that it would be used against me and they would say that that’s how I would’ve treated my ex-wife.

As time went by I grew increasingly anxious and concerned about the lack of contact from Laura Dean, along with the fast approaching court hearing in January. I suspected that the anonymous phone call that I’d received in October, was in fact Laura Dean. So I decided to call Laura Dean withholding my number as I suspected that she was deliberately not taking my calls, in order to say she wasn’t able to complete the section 7 as I was unreachable. The phone rang out until an answering machine or service took the call. I hung up and redialled again and Laura Dean answered the phone. This took place about a week or so before Christmas 2017, and I’d never not spent Christmas without my children from the moment that they were born. A few days later I got a missed call from one of her concerned work colleagues responding to one of my messages, so I called her back.

Application for Legal Aid and then Pro Boner

The first major argument myself and my ex-wife had was on our third wedding  anniversary where she dislocated my finger and I had to attend hospital to have it relocated. My ex-wife came with me. When I arrived at hospital and was being questioned in regard to how it happened, due to my ex-wife being there I didn't feel comfortable in disclosing the truth as I was afraid of the repercussions. The repercussions being she would disappear with our children. However when I was alone with the radiologist and was questioned, I told them the truth. As the radiologist is a specialist doctor, and my understanding is that my claim regarding my ex-wifes actions, should have been recorded and handed over to the appropriate authorities of which it wasn't. 

X-ray of finger at Newham General first argument in twelve years 29/05/2016

I applied for legal aid but was turned down therefore I was forced to represent myself in Court. I did inform the Judge that I'm living with dyslexia. As I was turned down for legal aid I then applied for bar pro bono of which I had been preliminary granted, but they were still waiting for the court bundle (court documents) to be forwarded to them.

My ex-wife was given a caution+ by the Police (first paragraph)

My Email request for Court Bundle to ex-wife's Solicitor

I sent an email request in the format of cease and desist and serving as legal notice. Beneath is the copy of the email sent.

I note the last contact made to me was via email on the 9th of March with bundle for hearing on the 12th of March. I make note of no bundle or instruction dates for two day hearing provided as of yet.

I'm kindly requesting you provide a hard copy bundle as well as electronic email version as soon as possible along with court hearing dates along with acknowledgement of this email please.

I would also ask you to respect my right of my quite enjoyment.

I give you no permissions or anybody representing your client to contact out of the context of the children's proceedings or to add any additional instructions of informations to such letters addressed to my email or at my home address.

Any further contact outs the context of the children proceedings would be a trespass of my quite enjoyment.

In light of same I require that you cease and desist.

Let this document serve as legal notice
Yours sincerely

Ex-wife's Solicitors reply;
I note the contents of your email .

Kindly confirm how you wish us to liaise with you as the post we are sending you has been returned.
I await to hear from you

Yours sincerely

My reply; 

I note the contents of your email .

Please note the content of my requests in my email are very clear. To date you have chosen not to meet key areas of my requests of the content of the bundle requests and the court hearing dates.

Court Bundle Fatherless Britain

Click on the image to view the dates; The Court bundle was sent out in the post on the 29th of May 2018 by recorded delivery, and booked in on the 30th May 2018 of which I was at the Family court delivering my papers. So I was not at home to receive it. The Family court case started on the 31st of May 2018, so not only did I not have the Court bundle to read and prepare myself with, but I didn't have all the papers from the bundle to refer to either. The Judge was made aware of this fact, as I requested an adjournment. It was at this point that she committed a denial fraud by saying the case will continue
From memory, a 400 page document/bundle!

Family Court Hearing Started in May 2018

At the start of the Court hearing in May 2018, I addressed the Court requesting an adjournment as despite my request by email, I hadn’t been provided with the Court Bundle in sufficient time. My ex-wife’s Legal Counsel then replied, “Your honour, I forwarded the Court Bundle to Mr Clark via email a few days ago, he could have downloaded it and printed it off”. Immediately the Judge she replied. "I agree the case will continue."

So right there and then at the beginning of the hearing, the Judge has just committed a denial fraud right at the beginning of the case.

Had I been given the opportunity to respond I would’ve explained that I was in the Court the day before handing in my court papers and that when I got home, there was a recorded delivery card on the door mat which I assumed was the Court bundle. It turned out that I was correct. It had been posted on the Wednesday afternoon, the Thursday I was at the court delivering my papers and the court case started on the Friday. Haven spoken spoken to individual people within the law profession after the court case, I was informed that this is normal behaviour in order to gain an advantage over the other party. In plain English, it was designed to make me look incompetent in not being able to take care of my affairs.

My ex-wife’s Legal Counsel then told the Court that I’d built a website called Fatherless Britain, and made a number of videos and posted them on the website. He went on to say that he had the downloaded videos for the Judge to view.

He then started to berate the videos describing them as rants, painting a picture of an individual who is anti establishment, where his main focus was upon highlighting the phrase that I used, that being, 'at the stroke of a judges pen' as being against the establishment. The Judge then asked me if I had an issue with the video being viewed in Court. I replied that I had no issue, as I’d already experienced this man telling an untruth about a conversation with myself in a previous hearing in September 2017.

After watching one video, the Judge then asked me if I was recording at that present time. I replied no. She then warned me that if I make and publish anymore videos or write anything pertaining to my case, that she would have me locked up.

To be clear and as a matter of transparency;

I’d made a video which was designed to address men’s mental health and the unspoken high suicide rate as a result of Parental Alienation. In this video I included clips of a recording showing Laura Dean the Cafcass Officer, seemingly deliberately avoiding my calls, then telling me that her job is to ascertain whether contact should allowed between my children and myself, and asking me what contact looks like should I ever see my children again.

Fatherless Britain, Men's Mental Health and Suicide after Parental Alienation

Laura Dean Cafcass officer of Holborn Family Court and Barking and Dagenham Social Worker then takes the stand

Laura Dean told the Court a number of things, one of them being that I’d shown no interest in my children what so ever in the interview with her, and all I wanted to talk about was my ex-wife. This wasn’t true because when I had previously been interviewed by Laura Dean, my conversation was solely focused upon the boys and discussing my ex-wife. At that time I recall that Laura Dean then interrupted my conversation saying, 'no that’s fine, as they both go hand in hand and it gives an insight as to how things got to this point.'

Laura Dean also told the court how she found my behaviour to be odd and strange when being interviewed at my home, as I laughed when she told me that my eldest son was upset when I didn’t give him a birthday card. She was correct because it was the first time in my child's entire life that he didn't receive a birthday gift from me. And the reason for that was because I was told that if I were to ever make contact with my children, I would be arrested bearing in mind the previous Judge had granted my ex-wife a Non-Molestation Order. 

And yes, I did laugh, however this brief laughter was a way of concealing the deep grief that I was experiencing as it was a laughter of frustration, it was a laughter of pain, it was a laughter of trauma, it was a laughter that came from deep depression as tears immediately ran down my face and the only thing I could say to Laura Dean was that it meant my son still loved me. It was hard enough being denied contact with my boys to then be denied the right to celebrate my son's 12th birthday with him, and to then have Laura Dean touch on this, inside I was a broken man. 

On my eldest son's 12th birthday, I was at a Millionaire Mind intensive business seminar as with my struggles I chose to just be around people with a positive mind set. I don't know how many hundreds of people were there but I would say, probably over a thousand people and they sang happy birthday to a few people there. When they heard about my story and that it was my son's 12th birthday, one of the organisers had me stand up at the front of the stage, told me to get my phone out and press record and then everyone sang happy birthday to my son calling his name so that I could play it to him when I see them. I told this to the Court, and was mocked by the Judge.

Laura Dean also told the Court how I had apparently told my children that their mother had suffered domestic abuse and violence from a previous relationship. Laura Dean went on to discuss how wrong I was for doing this. To be clear, I’ve never spoken to my children about my ex-wife’s former relationships, and never did I discuss this to Laura Dean.

I then asked Laura Dean if she knew that I was recording the interview's we had. She then replied that she now had been made aware that I was recording the interviews. I then asked her what her thoughts were about it? Her response clearly showed that she was not happy with my recording I replied, "So what about the lack of truth from yourself, can you not understand why someone like myself would record an interview with yourself?" She said something along the same lines as before, suggesting that I wasn’t being genuine and honest.

Laura Dean went on to make her recommendations, that being of supervised phone calls once a month for six months. 

At no time did the Judge ask to listen to any of my recordings of the interviews with the Cafcass Officer Laura Dean. All the Judge did was seem to ask Laura Dean questions that were easy for Laura Dean to answer, giving legitimacy to her evidence.

My ex-wife taking the Stand

When my ex-wife took the stand I was told by the Judge that I could only question her about the two arguments we had when the Police attended my home.

To be clear, I had based all of my arguments around this Non-Molestation Order, and now I was not being allowed to question my ex-wife about her claims and any of the details in this Non-Molestation Order, which is the very document that had stopped me from seeing my children in the first place. And let’s not forget back in September 2017, when I asked the Judge who'd authorised this Non-Molestation Order, about my right to challenge it, he clearly advised me that in his opinion it should be dealt with along with this hearing.

In questioning my ex-wife, I asked her what we were arguing about in the first argument. She replied, "we was arguing about you accusing me of having an affair." I asked what else we was arguing about. She replied, "that’s all we was arguing about." I then asked her so the children wasn’t the subject of the argument, she replied no. I then asked what type of argument was it, was it raised voices, shouting or was we screaming or what? She replied it was just raised voices.

I then turned to the Judge and told her that she had just clearly lied to the Court your honour, as I had recorded the argument. The Judge then asked me if I had the recording of the argument. I responded that the actual Dictaphones were still in Police position, but I had the recording of the argument on my laptop.

In the court it was said that both my sons had been seeing a counsellor, as they had been having anxiety attacks. However it was being put across as though it was my fault, but yet as you would envision in cases like this, on one document, my ex-wife is asked what kind of father is Mr Clark? Her reply was, "He is a good father."

The Police Offer Amba Reynelds who was carrying out an investigation had phoned me a few weeks before hand, and told me that her investigation was over. I told the officer that you do realise that my ex-wife was denning what we were arguing about don’t you? The officer repeated, "Mr Clark the investigation is over."

I took the stand

As I had stated at the beginning of the case, I didn’t have a court bundle, so the Judge gave me some spare pages from her bundle that she felt was relevant, and then asked my ex-wife and her Legal Counsel whether they had any spare pages  of which they both gave me. So now I'm in court fighting for the right be a Father to my children, yet I've not even been given a court bundle and everyone is giving me spare copies.

When I was being questioned, I pointed out to the Judge that there was a transcript of a conversation between myself and my ex-wife in the papers that I had delivered to the Court the day before, and if she read it, she’d see that my ex-wife had chosen to go down this particular route because I wouldn’t take her back. The Judge, she replied, 'What papers, I haven’t been given any papers from you.' I then stood up and pointed to the said papers that were in front of her on her desk. She glared at me, to which I sat back down. The questioning kept coming from my ex’s Legal Counsel to no avail as I replied to a number of his questions by saying, "Well it’s your client that has been witnessed lying." Then the Judge said "I’ll decide who’s lying or not lying" and then she made a statement reading from my papers that I’d delivered the day before. She said, “I’ll be the Judge of whether this should go to the High Court or not." At another point she went on to mention that she had 'received a bunch of papers in a very small font size' which could indicate that she never read it.

So in one hand the Judge said she hadn’t received my paperwork. She then went on to say that it was unfair that the other parties' Council hadn’t been given a copy. But what about me not having a court bundle from the very beginning and deliberately being made to look incompetent. So initially the Judge stated that she hadn't received any papers from myself, however she had them right there in front of her on her desk.

My ex-wife’s Legal Counsel said Mr Clark had been known to the Police for violence on more than one occasion. I replied that’s not true, I have a letter from Cafcass that states that I have no safe guarding convictions and asked if I could be excused from the stand in order to get the letter of which I did. In other words I do not have a violent history, I showed it to the Judge. She looked at it with a condescending glare and made no comment. 

My ex-wife's Legal Counsel continued to attempt to assassinate my character. I then showed the Judge the document which highlighted to the Judge where Ms Lyndsey Lampard stated that "There had been a number of parents who have complained of feeling intimidated by  Mr Clark. However neither myself nor any of my staff have ever felt this way about Mr Clark, and all of the parents that have described Mr Clark in this way, could all be described in the same manner themselves."

We resumed after lunch and the Legal Counsel continued to diminish my character as he said that it had been made known to Mrs Lampard that there were disagreements between other parents and myself. These disagreements where made known to Mrs Lampard by myself as we had a good friendship where I would openly discus a difference of opinion between other parents and myself. Things had always remained civil between all parents involved. Prior to this time, I had numerous meetings with Mrs Lampard regarding the bulling of my boys. It had been made known to her by myself that my children had been racially abused as they had been called the 'colour of poo' by these children, but no action was taken. 

Now, I did attempt on occasion to approach other parents in a calm, non threatening manner, parent to parent, adult to adult. However those parents refused to engage in a mere conversation with me regarding their children bullying my sons. At no point did I ever approach any parent in an aggressive, intimidating or violent manner, as things always remained civil.

Prior to this time back in May 2017 after the third Child Protection Meeting, based upon how I was treated within that meeting, I wrote a letter of complaint to Mrs Lampard clearly expressing my thoughts and feelings to her along with a letter of complaint to Andrew Calderwood who Chaired the second and third Child Protection Meeting.

However, it is very interesting that back in 2016, Mrs Lampard and others  

described me as being non-intimidating and strongly implied that other parents may have been the ones that were actually intimidating. But in May 2017 Mrs Lampard seems to have had a change of heart as she then wrote a report stating the complete opposite, by saying that I had confronted other parents and created issues and feelings of animosity among these parents, which created the opportunity for my ex-wife's Legal Counsel to then diminish my character by implying that I am violent and threatening. He was able to say this because Mrs Lyndsey Lampard wrote a report after I wrote a letter of complaint about her not dealing with the bullying situation appropriately. In this report Mrs Lyndsey Lampard did not highlighting the fact that these were the parents of the children who had been bullying my son. 

The Judge's summing up

In the Judge's summing up, she stated that it was clear to the Court that my ex-wife had been lying to the Court, however she stated she could understand why she would lie to the Court, but she failed to give any justification of her reasoning and  understanding of this factor. She then went on to state that she found my ex-wife to be more believable than myself. Now to be clear I wasn't found to be lying in any which way, shape or form, but my ex-wife who the court clearly found to be lying is believed more than myself. So the Judge concluded her summing up by imposing the continuation of the non-molestation order that I wasn't allowed to challenge for another six months and then imposed Laura Dean's recommendations, that being one phone call per month, for six months to be reviewed.

I asked the Judge if I could appeal this decision and if so, how could I go about it. She then explained that there were two forms of appeal, one to her, and if I were unsuccessful I could appeal to a circuit Judge. I then calmly explained that I was at a disadvantage from the beginning when the Judge interrupted me stating, 'If you are trying to say that you haven't had a fair hearing, I'm going to deny your appeal right now, and good luck with your appeal to the circuit Judge.' All this with a smile on her face while sniggering. The Judge had just committed another denial fraud in my first attempt of an appeal. I then asked the Judge how I would go about getting a transcript of the case. She then said to my-wife's Counsel that the findings would be forwarded to him and if he would be kind enough to forward a copy to myself, to which he agreed. But to this day I have never received any document from my ex-wife's legal counsel pertaining to the transcript of the Judge's findings. She then went on to state, good luck with finding the funding for the transcript of the case again with a smirk on her face.

In September 2018 the imposed recommended phone calls started but Laura Dean said my youngest didn't want to talk to me at all. On the third phone call neither of them wanted to talk to me. 

Upon hearing that the boys no longer wanted to talk to me, I recall standing on the kerb facing a local busy main road and as a bus approached, my mind went numb as I was wrapped up in the thoughts of not seeing my boys ever again. And as the bus approached I proceeded to  walk across the main road, as I felt my entire world had ended. The role of me being a father was no longer important, my purpose was meaningless. I felt empty and that feeling has never subsided. The only thing that saved me on that day was that the bus turned left to which I broke down with  uncontrollable tears in the middle of the road. These are some the experiences had by men loosing contact with their children. 

I had another meeting with Laura Dean and I explained to her that this was parental alienation and she practically told me to shut up and dismissed what I was saying to her. 

As a result of the repeated and continued lies and frauds these institutions have made against me, I have now not seen my children since they were nine and eleven, just over four years now, and these are important years because they are teenagers and they need there father in their lives. I have been denied my natural human rights based upon lies and frauds, and my children have been denied their natural human rights to have a father, again based upon lies and frauds. 

Fatherless Britain with son after a life saving operation

All of what I described regarding my experiences within the Court hearings will be backed up by the Court recordings, as these recordings are where all transcripts requested are taken from. Should these Court recordings be found to be not available, this becomes an automatic fraud, which means that a Court will have to take what I have said here to be a fact. 

The Mental affects of Parental Alienation 

In the last four years with me not seeing my sons, I have had to endure negative comments, judgments, and strained relationships with neighbours, friends and family . 

During this time I have been experiencing immense and overwhelming sadness, loneliness, solitude and emptiness as the emotional pain has been overwhelming. The feelings I have been living with on a day to day basis equates to feelings of loss, of grief, similar to mourning. And I've been living within this sea of emotion every single day, and these feelings do not get any better. I had my family ripped away from me based upon lies and abuses told against me by people who do not know me personally as a father. From observation of what I have experienced, with the individual professionals involved in colluding with my ex-wife to continually and systematically abuse me, this has forced me for my own sanity to go public with the story of my experience, as not only are none of these agencies willing to help or offer me any support in order for me to see my children again, but the individuals have actually been working together with the same agenda which was to rip my boys away from me. But for what reason? What was their real agenda?

From the very beginning Waltham Forest Social Services colluded with my abuser, being my ex-wife, and together they violated all my human rights as a man and as a father. As a result, with the help from members of other agencies which include the police and Mrs Lyndsey Lampard, they helped in steering my children out of my life by giving full parental control of our children solely to my ex-wife, all while creating a situation of which would be near on impossible to challenge the individual agencies along with the judicial system legally within the Courts. Although it's clear that an injustice has clearly taken place, in order for me to challenge what has happened, I would have to have substantial financial resources in order to take on the Family Division of the Judiciary System. Other individuals and agencies aiding this were Mrs Lyndsey Lampard, individual Police Officers, Cafcass Officer Laura Dean of Barking and Dagenham Social Services, my ex-wife's legal team along with the various Judges involved.

In a new episode of Dispatches aired on Tuesday 20th of July 2021, it was revealed that if an individual has a case that they want to fight in the Family Court, the average cost amounts to the £13,000, with 1 in 20 claiming they had spent well over £100,000. In one case, a woman had spent over a quarter of a million pounds with 37 court hearings in order to keep her ex-partner away from their children after finding out he had served a custodial sentence for sexually assaulting two young girls, and he was he was able to fight his case as he was funded via the public purse, being legal aid.

With the Judge threatening to lock me up at the beginning of my Family Court hearing just after committing a denial fraud, she didn't bank on me having the resolve to risk my own liberty to challenge and expose the systematic abuse that I've been forced to endure, publicly if necessary.

The toll of this entire experience has led me to cry a sea of tears such that I now wear what appears as round bags under my eyes, where the mental stress of and loss is clearly written all over my face. My hair literally turned grey over night. 

And to Madam Judge, you along with other members of the establishment, you attempted to emasculate me, and maybe you didn't expect a man such as myself to express such emotions openly and publicly. You underestimated my resolve and strength of character, and you underestimated the true love a father has for his beloved children.

However, the thing that concerns me the most now and which is unknown to me, is how are my boys dealing with this? How are they dealing with loss of me, their father not being in their lives?  Where are my boys? It was said in the court that they had been seeing a counsellor due to having suffered anxiety attacks which was being relayed to me in court as being my fault. Not only are my children  needlessly suffering psychological stress, I myself am living with mental stress, anxiety and panic attacks as a result.

Therefore, what was gained from this situation? My children had their father literally ripped away from them overnight and a father who is living with the loss of his children, so we are both equally experiencing pain and are mentally scarred. A family has been torn apart for no real good reason, but none of these agencies fought to keep us together. In effect, they did the complete opposite and fought to keep us apart. Therefore who actually wins?

The day after delivering my second Child at home with his eldest on his back

When my first son was born I was over whelmed with joy and the emotion with becoming a father, I was 38. One of the first conversations I had with him, was me promising him that I would be the best dad that I could be, I would always be there for him no mater what, and I would always stay committed to the family. He was less than a week old. I continually lived this promise where me and my boys formed a strong loving and caring bond. This transcended down to his younger brother my second son when I delivered him at home, with my first son playing and climbing on my back with the phone on my shoulder under my ear while talking to 999. My eldest son actually witnessed me deliver his brother coming into the world. This was such an amazing and overwhelming experience, beyond our wildest dreams.

Smiling faces of Fatherless Britain

Being a Formula 1 and Moto GP fan, as a family we would regularly watch all the races including my ex-wife. I would highlight how we were witnessing history being created as both my sons would pretend to be either Valentino Rossi or Lewis Hamilton. And I would tell my boys they could do anything they wanted if they put their minds to it. We would watch shows such as TopGear and Fifth Gear all the time such that, both my sons encouraged me to apply as a presenter on the new TopGear. 

I am keeping my promise and leading by example and by publicly speaking out, as I have no alternative but to illustrate how the Judge and other professionals involved, instead of supporting us, they have done everything within their power to separate us permanently. They did this by denying me my right to speak and represent myself fairly by committing denial frauds. They propagated mis-information's which add up to character assentation and again, not allowing me the opportunity to rebut these non truths and defend myself fairly or appropriately. And anytime I did speak, my words were ignored and promptly dismissed. Collectively they legally abused me and bullied me such that, if it were a child at school, it add up to one child getting the other children to gang up and ridicule that single child. They used specific descriptive type wording and phrases like, 'his unpredictable behaviour' without ever giving a real example, or aggressive or intimidating again without giving a real life example or backed with any witnesses. These are tactics of which social workers and other professionals have told me, are words that are used to remove fathers from the equation, and these words work specifically well when dealing with men of ethnic backgrounds.

From the very first Child Protection Meeting I could feel that things were working against me, but I was powerless to do anything about it. So I told my sons that if anything were to happen and if they wanted to talk to me, or tell me anything, simply look and whisper the message to one of the birds in a tree, and that bird will come and land in the tree in the front garden and will give me the message when I'm washing the breakfast dishes in the morning, or when I'm making your Mac and cheese for dinner.

Fatherless Britain's Son rescues a young bird

Being a full time hands on father, I remember doing a charity parachute jump for my eldest son's Nursery and always played an active roll in my children's lives throughout their Nursery, Infant and Junior school years, always volunteering when parent helpers were needed for days trips and outings.

Fatherless Britain raising money for local children's nursery

Due to an accident I was unable to return to the line of work that I had done for many years, so this gave me the opportunity to become a stay at home father and it was a role that I relished. It was the best job in the world where I was always there to take my children to school and pick them up. During this time of convalescence I completed several different adult courses' with self improvement in mind and wanting to do my best, and set a good example for my boys to follow. I graduated from Westminster-Kingsway College in 2015 at the age of forty eight. It was a joint agreement that my ex-wife went back to work and I be a stay at home Dad.

Allotment fun with Fatherless Britain's Sons

During the period of 2014 to 2016 being a stay at home Dad, I became the primary carer ironing their clothes, making their breakfast, taking them to school and picking them up. Quite often my ex-wife and I would meet up for a coffee and we would pick them up from school together. 

Fatherless Britain and sons admiring the birds

During the school holidays me and my sons would visit nature reserves as my both my sons liked birds, with their favourite being the Peregrine falcon. We would go for bike rides to and through the forests and while we were there we had immense fun climbing trees and building dens. We also spent time on our allotment where they would dig for worms, look lizards and other mini-beasts.

Fatherless Britain sons and Mini-Beasts

Fatherless Britain teaching his sons how to ride their bikes

Fatherless Britain having fun with sons climbing trees

My eldest son got to the age when the school started taking the children swimming. So during the six weeks school holidays I started taking both my sons swimming and they absolutely loved it. We would visit several different pools throughout the area. I would get in the infant pool with them and would hold and support them while they were splashing their little legs learning to swim. After a while I would demonstrate different swimming strokes for them and would show them how to take a breath by turning the head, then they would copy me.

Fatherless Britain sons swimming toys and goggles

We would play diving games where I would throw their diving rocket shark weights into the pool and they would race each other, diving deep to find them and coming to the top of the water being triumphant with their find. We had so much fun! I will hold and cherish these memories forever. Their swimming became proficient enough that we would venture to bigger pools. When they went back to school after the holidays I would often see my eldest son with his class going to and coming back from swimming. On one of these occasions, my son's school teacher who used to take my eldest son's class swimming, saw me walking on the other side of the road in the opposite direction. She was waving at me enthusiastically to gain my attention, and was giving me a big thumbs up in acknowledgement of the difference in my son's swimming ability. This very same teacher whom I had a good parent/teacher relationship with (as I did with most of the teachers in their Primary school), however now she gives me dirty looks whenever she sees me as do some of the other teachers. There are three or four teachers from my children's former Primary school who still say hello when they see me, showing a level of compassion of which I am very grateful for.

Fatherless Britain's Son finds a little lizard at allotment

Fatherless Britain and his children in their tree den

During the separation period between myself and my ex-wife, our sons would spend most of their time with me. I continued being the father I was born to be. Being a loving and caring father came natural to me. 

As a family we had so many good times together that it breaks my heart to know that because myself and my ex-wife no longer have a relationship, I have been forced to no longer have a relationship with my sons, aided by the agencies who were supposed to help and support us.

Fatherless Britain gets a new nick-name

Above is a picture which was taken at the Natural History Museum . We entered what is known as the Brontosaurus room and on this day I gained a couple of nick-names! It was amazing to see these huge dinosaurs with skin, swaying back and fourth and roaring. I felt one of my sons clinging around my leg, I asked him "What's the matter boy?" As he cowered behind me he pointed and muttered "Dad look!" So I made up a Daddy story and said to him, "Oh don't worry about old Bronto, he is my mate, I went to school with him". He then asked me "Does that mean you are a dinosaur Dad?" From that day Daddy was a dinosaur or an old fossil. My sons also gave me the nick-name Old Goat, and we would always be laughing and joking about it. But one day when they called me Old Goat, I told them that I was proud of that nick-name, because when I explained the abbreviated meaning of Goat, the expression on their little faces is forever cemented in my memory! These are some of the fun times that I will never forget with my boys.

Life Long Affects of Parental Alienation BBC Report February 2020

See it here

I used say to my sons, "I teach you how to think and not what to think." One day you'll be young men and in order to navigate this world, you'll need to know and have your own minds.' So when Laura Dean told me that my sons no longer want to speak to me, I know not to believe her because the love and the bond was and is too strong. Someone saw one of my sons and my son told them, '"Mum and the social worker said we're not allowed to see my Dad." 

Sons of Fatherless Britain Gathering top soil to Make Flower Beds

As well as being a firm but fair Dad, I would spoil them with love and laughter. I used to take my boys football, karate, teach them boxing with pad work. They used to see me doing D.I.Y jobs around the house. One of the first jobs they helped me with was to refurbish the decking in the back garden by sanding and repainting it with me along with repainting the fence. And together we built a couple of raised flower beds and created a herb garden. Genuinely, I would talk to my sons about situations in life and how to deal with them when they come across them. I would show them how you can't control other people and their actions, but you do have a choice in how you choose  to respond. There was a time when my ex-wife would attempt to start arguments and would walk around the house slamming doors. On one occasion she stormed out the house and went to see her friend Fumie, leaving the boys with me as usual. I asked them, "What do you fancy doing now boys, golf or football?"  They picked golf, so as we collected our clubs up and approached the front door, I asked them who was arguing? They said "Mummy was arguing and slamming the doors Daddy." I replied "OK, and what was I doing?" They replied, "You was sitting in the front room on your laptop Daddy." I replied "that's right. You are getting older now and the girls are going to start chasing you, but sometimes things don't always go smoothly. But what ever happens don't ever put your hands on a woman, don't abuse her in anyway because real men don't argue with, or hit women." So off we went and knocked a few balls about. 

Sons of Fatherless Britain enjoying the fruits of their labour

Remedies

Sunday 12^th February 2017, the Guardian published an article. "Britain is facing a “crisis of fatherlessness” in which almost half of all children born today will not be living with both parents by the time they are 15, the new chief executive of the thinktank founded by Iain Duncan Smith has warned." ~ Anushka Asthana, The Guardian. 

Sunday 12th of February 2017. 

Question: 

If Iain Duncan Smith is genuinely so concerned about the future of a Fatherless Britain, why did he not help me? Why was he laughing at me in our meeting? Why haven't I seen my son's since May 2017?

While under the leadership of Prime Minister Theresa May, Boris  Johnson, and Rishi Sunak, I had spoken and communicated with Sir Iain Duncan Smith on three separate occasions, where I was very clear and concise with the points that I raised in regards to my situation, and the third occasion was in writing. 

The first occasion was in his chambers where he continuously interrupted me between every sentence, interrogating my every sentence and not allowing me to string more than two sentences together, all while chuckling as if he was debating with the opposition as in labour across the benches at parliament. All this, while although trying my upmost but unsuccessfully holding back the tears from running down my face. 

On the second occasion I explained to him in short bulleted, pointed fashion, exactly what I'd experienced via all of the agencies. As before, he just wasn't interested at all. This was on the campaign trail with Shaun Bailey's bid to become the Mayor of London. 

The third and final time was in writing, where I communicated my experiences and requested my right for legal remedies under section 4 of the criminal act, of 1967, which invokes what is known as the protection of the crown.

In response to my email, Iain Duncan Smith, forwarded my email to Dominic Raad who was for the second time, the deputy PM. This time to Rishi Sunak, the current Prime Minister. Dominic Raad is a trained and qualified solicitor who started his legal career with Linklaters, and served as Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor from September 2021 to September 20222. 

In Dominic Raabs email response, he suggests that I might want to seek advise from the Citizens Advice Bureau, meanwhile, the link for human trafficking has now been removed from the Governmental Legislation Section website 1967. 

Bearing in mind the last time I saw my two son's was in May 2017 when I dropped them off to school, it was in Feb 2017, that the chief executive of CSJ (the Centre for Social Justice) founded by Iain Duncan Smith, is saying that Britain is in danger of becoming a Fatherless society, published in the Guardian.

Fatherless Britain Iain Duncan Smith

Therefore, based upon these factual experiences, I regretfully I find myself having to declare the family division of the judiciary system, along with the Children's Social Services with it's draconian attitudes, to be woefully, unfit for purpose.

Beneath I have listed the immediate remedies I require:

• Unlimited financial resources provided via the Government in regards to legal fees and legal costs.
• A full public and open investigation into the operations of Waltham Forest Social Services in relation to my case specifically, along with all other agencies and parties involved.
• All parties to be held legally accountable within the findings of the actions taken, or the lack of actions not taken, with immediate actions taken in charges brought in charges and sentencing as apposed to usual public farce excuses of lessons will be learnt, and recommendations, where none of the guilty parties suffer any form consequences of incarceration.
• I also understand that based upon my experiences as described and detailed here, these are known as state frauds. Therefore I am automatically entitled to the Protection of the Crown, along with full funding for all Court Transcripts and Recordings of all Court hearings, along with all costs for full representations in all specific areas of law required.
• Prime Minister's, Theresa May 2016 - 2019, Boris Johnson 2019 – 2022, Liz Truss 2022, Rishi Sunak 2022 - present along with former leader Iain Duncan Smith and deputy PM, Dominic Raab.  As I'm sure you can understand, I do not wish for any of the said names mentioned here to attempt to make any form of contact with me in any shape or form. 
• If the said mentioned names wish to contact me. This should be arranged at my convenience in an environment of my choice along with any independent individual's of my choice.  ~ Nicholas Clark Fatherless Britain

To view comments in relation to the content on this page, see the comments box here below at the bottom of the page. 

To post your thoughts and comments in relation to this page in the comments, just click on the drop-down arrow at the top of the comments section to sign in with your Gmail account. 

Once signed in you'll be able to post your thoughts in the comments section. Once approved, your comments will appear there, as all comments are moderated in order to avoid spamming.

Fatherless Britain © copyright 2017 - 2024